[MPlayer-cvslog] r26411 - trunk/libmpdemux/demuxer.c

[Diego Biurrun]

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 05:21:59PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 04:27:50PM +0300, Ivan Kalvachev wrote:
> > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Reimar Döffinger
> > <Reimar.Doeffinger at stud.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 01:38:06PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > >> diego           1038     504     1542
> > >> reimar           690     246      936
> > >> voroshil         312       8      320
> > >> nico             212      43      255
> > >> benjamin         144      32      176
> > >> ulion            153      13      166
> > >> eugeni           106      56      162
> > >> uoti              99      20      119
> > 
> > Reimar, looking at these numbers, I'd say that you are de-facto project leader.
> > Diego is not coder and none of his commits changes the way MPlayer
> > works. He is doing a lot of refactoring and cosmetics.
> > 
> > Reimar, please take the Project Leader role and resolve the situation
> > in the way you like it.
> 
> yes, seconded, and my emphasis is on _resolve_. Not the "playing deaf" diego

I will write up a statement/explanation before the weekend draws to a
close.  I have no time right now because I am meeting friends in a few
minutes.

> He once wanted to close ivans ffmpegs svn account

You are not giving a correct representation of the facts here.  It was
Mans that proposed closing Ivan's FFmpeg account, I just seconded that
notion.  You may, and you are certainly free to, disagree with me, but I
don't consider committing non-free code to be in the same class of issue
as removing parentheses in a commit (wrongly) labeled "indent".  You
were also not around when Mans and I discussed with a stubborn Ivan on
IRC.

But mind you, this issue is long forgotten, forgiven even, so let us
please not start a subflamewar out of this.

> (that was around the time when he also wanted to
> close all doc maintainers access to ffmpeg svn)

This is also not a correct retelling of the facts.  In the beginning
commit access to FFmpeg and MPlayer were the same thing.  That meant
that each and every FFmpeg committer had full commit access to MPlayer
and vice versa.  After the first Uoti incident, you wanted that changed
and I implemented it, according to your instructions.

I suggested removing the MPlayer translator which have never done any
code changes from the list of FFmpeg committers.  None of them had ever
committed to FFmpeg (nor have they since) and I doubt they were or are
really aware of the fact that they can.  Their commit accounts were
never intended for FFmpeg.

You wanted to keep them, so I left them in the list of committers.

Diego