[Mplayer-dev-eng] Matrox dualhead and syncfb.

[German Gomez Garcia]

On Tue, 1 May 2001, Felix Buenemann wrote:

> On Dienstag,  1. Mai 2001 23:04 you wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 May 2001, Felix Buenemann wrote:
> > > Just did some calculation using your math and think it comes out to the
> > > same result: 1.85/1 / (1280/1024) * 720 = 1066 now split it up so screen
> > > resolution calc can be done by libvo: 1.85/1 * 720 = 1332 second step is
> > > 1024/1280 = 0.8 * 1333 = 1066 voila. Now as I do it the other way around
> > > that's 720/1066 = 0.6756 * 576 = 389. Now if I look at what mplayer
> > > -aspect 1.85:1 does: "VO: [sdl] 720x576 => 720x389  YV12".
> > > So do you see something incorrect in this? Or have I missed calculating
> > > for proper screen res in second way? (looking at it 720x389 looks very ok
> > > -> very round flashlight in the matrix [no egg])
> > > (I'm getting slightly confused =)
> >
> > 	So, the problem is that I get the wrong version from your email??
> > Just pasted from mplayer output:
> >
> > Aspect: Destination: 720x368
> > Aspect: X: 1.850000
> > Aspect: Y: 1.000000
> > VO: [fbdev] 720x368 => 720x389  BGR32
> >
> Erm, 720x368? DVD-res is 720x576, how do you get those values?

	Nope, it's not a DVD, it's a DivX, but I suppose that aspect
should work independently of image properties, shouldn't it? Although
maybe it doesn't have a clear meaning for non-standard images. I don't
really know...

	- german

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
German Gomez Garcia         | "This isn't right.  This isn't even wrong."
<german at piraos.com>         |                         -- Wolfgang Pauli


_______________________________________________
Mplayer-dev-eng mailing list
Mplayer-dev-eng at lists.sourceforge.net
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng