[MPlayer-dev-eng] What happened to deinterlacing?

[Felix Buenemann]

On Tuesday, 16. October 2001 16:08, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2001 15:10, marpet at linuxpl.org wrote:
[snip]
>
> > :-)
> >
> > Question: is the postprocessing optionset going to standarize in some
> > way? Currently it is a bit messy - any ideas where it is going to go?
>
> no clue :)
> commandline options would be a nice thing, something like
> -deint=linblend
> -denoise=temp,25	(25 is the threshold to use)
> or
> -deint-linblend
> -denoise-temp=25
> or
> ...
hmm how about adding a function like getppmodebyname() that is fed with a 
string from the commandline in the form of:
-pp deblock1,linblend,tmpdenoise:25,lumdering or something in that way?

Hmm, but it gets problematic the moment we use additional parameters (cause 
we can't simply map a string to a pp value and add it to the flags) so maybe 
it's a better idea to split it up like this:
-deinterlace linearblend
-dering luma,chroma
-deblock rk1v,rk1h
-levelfix

and we could define some defaults for each switch that are used when called 
without paramters like only -deinterlace.

And another very cool thing would be to rate the pp's by quality and speed 
and depending on free cpu time use the faster or the better looking 
algorithmn (for -autoq).

>
> Michael
-- 
Best Regards,
	Atmos
____________________________________________
- MPlayer Developer - http://mplayerhq.hu/ -
____________________________________________
Software is like sex: it's better when it's free.
	- Linus Torvalds