[MPlayer-dev-eng] CVS alternatives
Anders Rune Jensen
anders at gnulinux.dk
Tue Oct 1 01:17:44 CEST 2002
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 00:58:13 +0200 (CEST)
Anders Rune Jensen <anders at gnulinux.dk> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 01:07:02 +0200
> Arpi <arpi at thot.banki.hu> wrote:
>
[...]
> > subversion - its' at early state of development, just reached the
> > point that even works. i wouldn't move mplayer to it yet...
> I've been using subversion for my own small projects for quite a while
> now (6+ months). I initially had some problems, but since they reached
> alpha I havn't had any problems. One bad thing about subversion is the
> maintainance overhead, because new clients is released often, and even
> worse, new servers which require new apache, which requires new php
> etc. is released quite often. They also have a nasty habbit of
> changing the internal structure (since it's still alpha), which means
> you would have to dump your current repos. and then import it again
> with a new version. With all that being said I havn't lost any data to
> subversion yet.
Ohh yes another note is that subversion is much slower than cvs. The
will off course become better over time.
> [..]
> >
> > A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team
>
> --
> Anders Rune Jensen
--
Anders Rune Jensen
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list