[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] MacOS X Application Bundle Support
Nicolas Plourde
nicolas.plourde at sympatico.ca
Thu Dec 23 01:29:53 CET 2004
On 22-Dec-04, at 5:41 PM, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> Hi,
>>>>> You can be sure that I will vote for _removing_ our current Gui
>>>>> before I
>>>>> agree on adding yet another such a permanently broken piece of
>>>>> crap.
>>>>> And that's what it will become unless it only uses slave mode and
>>>>> then
>>>>> there's no need to have it in MPlayer's cvs dir (a Gui is a lot of
>>>>> code
>>>>> to download for people who have no use for it).
>>>>>
>>>> I agree. But why not removing the current gtk gui?
>>>
>>> Sidenote: It's a mix of GTK and xlib unfortunately, if it were GTK
>>> only it would be easily portable to Windows and Mac OS X and much
>>> more
>>> useful.
>>>
>>> I don't see why we should remove the GUI (without a good
>>> replacement).
>>> Some people do like having a GUI, there's no need to take it away
>>> from
>>> them. MPlayer is around 27M uncompressed (4.9M compressed), the Gui
>>> dir is about 1.1M (175k compressed). That's not an unbearable amount
>>> of bloat IMO.
>>
>> Is it possible to remove all gui (xlib>k) code from mplayer and
>> place
>> it all in libgui ?
>
> Posssible? Well, a lot is possible but writing a gui from scratch will
> probably be easier. The Gui is really implemented in a very ugly way.
> It
> has its tentacles sticking everywhere in the code :-(
>
>> this way it would be possible to create a dyn library for it and
>> create
>> native gui for other
>> platform by using dynamic library.
>
> Please! Take me seriously and don't even think about using anything
> else
> than slave mode (ok, you may _think_ about it but please not more ;-)
> ).
> This is the only way both can develop more or less
> independant, and given the small amount of interest in the Gui among
> the
> developers this is the only way it will not be broken all the time.
> Not to mention that it will lead to a better slave mode and make things
> easier for other Guis (also allowing them to have different license -
> although not everyone may see this as an advantage).
>
why not start a new portable "plugin"/slave mode gui for mplayer then,
sound like
a good idea and in the process get rid of the actual broken code.
====
Nicolas Plourde <nicolas.plourde at sympatico.ca>
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list