[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] changes in vf_get_image semantics

[Reimar Döffinger]

Hi,
> > [...]
> > > > the desired destination size or just write it somewhere to vf_instance_s 
> > > > and let it be. get_image would be then called with the current and next 
> > > > vf as argument, instead of next and x/y-size.
> > > 
> > > again you totally misunderstand the video layer. i don't have time to
> > > test and debug this stuff right now, but imo someone like myself,
> > > ivan, or michael who understands it should be the one to fix it,
> > > rather than you adding crazy hacks based on misunderstandings.
> > 
> > Oh, I'm sure we would not mind that. If only it looked like this is
> > ever going to happen. This bug is know at least since months, and
> > nobody gave even any useful comment.
> 
> could you do some research then and find out why it doesn't happen
> with vd_ffmpeg.c?

No, I can't because it does happen with vd_ffmpeg.c as well (maybe not
in all cases though). See my second patch in the "segfault in vf_scale"
thread.

Greetings,
Reimar Döffinger