[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] fix for -srate bug

[Jan Knutar]

On Tuesday 19 October 2004 19:07, D Richard Felker III wrote:

> libsamplerate is bloated, poor code. the resampler in lavc is much
> faster and can do the same stuff and probably more than your precious
> libsamplerate. can we please let this rest? dependencies on new poorly
> written libs are not welcome in mplayer.

Aren't most library dependencies in MPlayer made optional anyway? I like it
that way...

Anyway, there's -sws, so why not -arm (audio resample method), or perhaps more
apropriately as a suboption to -af resample, wouldn't that be somewhat acceptable
for inclusion, making its presence totally optional?