[MPlayer-dev-eng] What about "timer-darwin.c"?

[Nicolas Plourde]

On 12-Apr-05, at 3:24 PM, Chris Roccati wrote:

> Hello all,
> recently in the mailing list someone pointed out the performances  
> impact of the Darwin specific timer code.
> After a few test it became clear that the native code is far more  
> CPU intensive than the nanosleep() based code from "timer-lx.c" and  
> apparently offers no advantages. So why is it there?

I think there is a problem with timer-lx and -cache option. If Im  
wrong I dont see the point of using timer-darwin anymore.