[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] Remove redundant XShmGetEventBase declaration
Diego Biurrun
diego at biurrun.de
Thu Aug 7 01:33:36 CEST 2008
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 03:59:01PM -0400, compn wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 21:06:53 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 08:59:49AM -0400, compn wrote:
> >> On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 09:13:46 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> >On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 07:57:36PM -0400, compn wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 23:38:45 +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> >> >On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 07:58:39PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> >> >> Here is a patch to remove a redundant XShmGetEventBase declaration from
> >> >> >> libvo/vo_x11.c and libvo/vo_xvmc.c, which dates back to r2(!). If this
> >> >> >> is really a problem, there should be a proper check in configure, not a
> >> >> >> hackish declaration duplicated over multiple files.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Will apply on the weekend.
> >> >>
> >> >> then you will be breaking rule 5 and 9 since iive has already
> >> >> rejected it for vo_xvmc.
> >> >>
> >> >> rule 9 says "actively maintained" and iive reviews vo_xvmc patches so
> >> >> i believe its active.
> >> >
> >> >I don't remember a review, much less a timely one. All of the XVMC
> >> >stuff has had known issues for many years, none of which were ever
> >> >addressed, even though there were promises to do so. In my book, this
> >> >is incompatible with any interpretation of the term "actively
> >> >maintained".
> >>
> >> are these bugs documented somewhere? a quick search on bugzilla returns 0.
> >
> >Off the top of my head:
> >
> >- crash with libmenu
> iive posted a patch to stop the crash, it went ignored. where is
> libmenu maintainer? also he requested some help with vf stuff to get
> libmenu working with xvmc , but got no reply.
> http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-users/2008-June/073275.html
No fix was ever committed.
> >- unfinished configure part
> what needs to be done exactly?
(working) autodetection
> >- duplicated xvmc_render.h header (exists in libavcodec as well)
> yep thats a duplicated header. will ffmpeg get it svn external or mplayer?
> this older message might describe the current situation:
> http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2005-April/000283.html
MPlayer should use the header in FFmpeg. For that the header needs to
be exported. Ivan wanted to do a cleanup before exporting the header.
Nothing has happened for years ever since.
> you could ask iive to test your patch and see if it breaks on his system.
> instead of threatening to commit and ignoring his maintainership.
> but i'm guessing you two are too busy fighting to talk to each other.
Would you kindly stop ignoring the arguments I have posted multiple
times?
I plan to remove an incorrect hack, not a feature.
Diego
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list