[MPlayer-dev-eng] [RFC] libavutil/x86_cpu.h
Diego Biurrun
diego at biurrun.de
Fri Aug 6 18:28:17 CEST 2010
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 06:03:33PM +0200, Reimar Döffinger wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:40:05AM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:23:25AM +0200, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> > > Carl Eugen Hoyos ha scritto:
> > >> Reimar Döffinger<Reimar.Doeffinger<at> gmx.de> writes:
> > >>
> > >>> I am not particularly in favour of supporting such a build configuration,
> > >>> also anyone who removes libavutil can still copy that file themselves...
> > >>>
> > >> +1
> > >
> > > I'm more in favor of forcing ffmpeg to export all needed headers,
> > > however private they may be
> >
> > As I already said, for x86_cpu.h this will not be possible. So you
> > will have to choose between copying it and keeping libavutil in the
> > source tree.
>
> I suspect that it might be possible to export the parts of it we
> actually need, I just don't like it either since the REG_* all
> would need to be renamed.
Feel free to attempt this, but when I raised the topic on IRC, it came
to end quickly and I don't expect this to go differently on the ml:
[11:42:09] <DonDiego> what are the chances of libavutil/x86_cpu.h becoming an installed header?
[11:42:17] * DonDiego guesses 0
[12:13:55] * mru wonders what diego wants with that header
[12:18:42] * kshishkov suspects it may be for MPlayer
[12:19:07] * kshishkov also suspect that if it is so, that means MPlayer is broken
[12:19:14] <thresh> mplayer is notorious for using uninstalled headers
[12:19:24] <mru> that header can never be installed
[12:19:31] <mru> it uses compiler-specific tests
Diego
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list