[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] Enhanced Video Renderer (EVR)
Georgi Petrov
gogothebee at gmail.com
Wed Feb 2 07:50:21 CET 2011
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:30 PM, Georgi Petrov <gogothebee at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Reimar Döffinger
> <Reimar.Doeffinger at gmx.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 08:54:08PM +0200, Georgi Petrov wrote:
>>> /**
>>> * This file has no copyright assigned and is placed in the Public Domain.
>>> * This file is part of the w64 mingw-runtime package.
>>> * No warranty is given; refer to the file DISCLAIMER.PD within this package.
>>> */
>>
>> Uh, this definitely is not a ZPL license, it says public domain.
>> I can't say I like it because public domain basically only has a legal meaning
>> in the US, but I can't see any reason why this couldn't be included into
>> MinGW (32 bit) if this is correct.
>> And please be careful when say "ZPL", version 1.0 is no GPL-compatible,
>> 2.x are (according to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html).
>
> Okay, I see. I will work this out with mingw/mingw-w64 guys and write back.
>
Mingw-w64's core is ZPL, but its header files are public domain. This
means that evr.h or any other files I work on will remain public
domain. The core of mingw-w64 (as I understand it) is ZPL exactly
because public domain has no meaning outside US.
This also means that mingw shouldn't have anything against it, but
they haven't answered yet. Anyway - evr.h and vo_evr.c are going to
change on a daily/weekly basis in the next months, so what do you
suggest? Even if mingw decide to include it (I think they would), are
you against temporary inclusion of evr.h in MPlayer until it get's
better enough? I need to know it order to prepare the first patch.
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list