[MPlayer-DOCS] Improved vi_qfactor and (tcplx|scplx|p)_mask

[Guillaume POIRIER]

Le lun 27/09/2004 à 07:32, The Wanderer a écrit :
> Guillaume POIRIER wrote:
> 
> > Hi, Le dim 26/09/2004 à 19:27, The Wanderer a écrit :
> > 
> >> Agreed, with one more niggle: in the vi_qfactor description, I
> >> would recommend "non-I frames", to make it more clear that you are
> >> talking about "I frames" and "non-I frames" rather than "I" and
> >> "non I frames". That's one of my instinctive-precision things,
> >> though, and I wouldn't scream too loudly if you didn't think it was
> >> worth changing.
> > 
> > I understand what you mean, it's just that everywhere in the manpage
> > it is written "smth frame" with no dash. I wrote that for consitency
> > reasons, which is something Diego really cares about.
> 
> I know, and I think it's important too. You'll notice that I didn't
> suggest "non-I-frames", but "non-I frames"; it's still "something
> frames", it's just that the something is now the compound term "non-I"
> instead of just part of that term, "I".

You convinced me. I fixed it on my tree.
Thanks

Guillaume