[MPlayer-users] gcc 2.95.3 vs. gcc 3.2

Lethal Weapon lethalwp at tiscali.be
Fri Aug 30 18:05:02 CEST 2002


On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 17:29, Arpi wrote:
> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
> Hi,
> 
> I've done some quick comparson between 2.95.3 and brand-new 3.2 version.
> Note, that 3.2 supports pentium4 target/optimization, so it should result
> better code - in theory.
> 
> System: 1.8ghz p4, 512mb rd800 ram, i850, abit th7-ii raid mb, ibm 80g hdd
> MPlayer: CVS version, almost every auto-detectable option present and detected
i wonder why ppl buy Pentium 4..

Yes they can get higher clocks, but they are fuxored, at same clock p3
is way faster, same for athlon's

P4 is there only for marketing
not for performances


Greetz,
	Ltwp




More information about the MPlayer-users mailing list