[MPlayer-users] mga_vid - xv how much faster?
Arpi
arpi at thot.banki.hu
Fri Dec 13 00:37:01 CET 2002
Hi,
> > > and how much faster is mga_vid than xv?
> >
> > It's faster because you don't need X at all (you can stay
> > in command line and save X overhead).
> >
> > Otherwise you can _also_ use mga_vid with X, use -vo xmga
> > and then you can compare yourself.
>
> Even xmga is a lot faster than xv. The issue is that xv copies the
> image around in ram and/or does slow pixel packing in C. Just having X
> around doesn't make things slower; mga and xmga should be the same
> speed.
speed is just one thing.
mga/xmga has a much more important advantage/feature: hardware triple
buffering. so it provides stable, jitter-less video.
anyway there are patches flying around for Xv to add this functionality,
but afaik it's pain in the ass to get them compile + working...
A'rpi / Astral & ESP-team
--
Developer of MPlayer, the Movie Player for Linux - http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list