[MPlayer-users] new animatrix , old problems :)

[D Richard Felker III]

On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 04:45:52PM +0300, Catalin Muresan wrote:
> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]

> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 03:09:32PM +0200, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
>  > [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
>  > On Saturday, 05 April 2003, Catalin Muresan wrote:
>  > [...]
>  > >  > Cool. RPMs for faad. I'll take a look at them. I assume the mplayer RPMs
>  > >  > there are the ones I provide?
>  > > 
>  > > 	no, i changed to -2 because i disabled runtime cpu detection (just
>  > > changed the spec and rebuilt the rpms) so it's for a duron - like the dir
>  > > says.
>  > > 	it would be nice if you could publish rpms with faad from now on :)
>  > 
>  > I could, provided that I see some positive responses from other developers.
>  > When I started maintaining the official RPMs A'rpi, a few other developers
>  > and I agreed on a certain set of features that is now present in the
>  > current MPlayer packages. Adding faad support means that the users would
>  > need to download and install yet another package.
> 
> 	http://www.audiocoding.com/download.php says that binary
> distributions is prohibited so that limits the options :(

Not really. The developers do not prohibit it since the code is under
GPL. Rather, they suggest that it might violate patent law, which we
don't care about.

Rich