[MPlayer-users] Possible bug with mencoder cvs

[D Richard Felker III]

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 11:10:11AM -0700, Shane Wegner wrote:
> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
> Hi,
> 
> Using mencoder (latest cvs) along with latest CVS of
> libavcodec, I am getting "too many video packet" errors
> encoding ntsc DVD titles.  Using mplayer 0.90, these errors
> do not show up.
> 
> Output follows:
> Pos:  69.4s   1532f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  80min 472mb
> A-V:0.019 [1024:448]
> Pos:  69.4s   1533f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  80min 472mb
> A-V:0.023 [1024:448]
> Pos:  69.4s   1534f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  80min 472mb
> A-V:0.027 [1024:448]
> 1 duplicate frame(s)!
> Pos:  69.5s   1535f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  80min 473mb
> A-V:0.031 [1024:448]
> Too many video packets in the buffer: (4096 in 8276934
> bytes).
> Maybe you are playing a non-interleaved stream/file or the
> codec failed?
> For AVI files, try to force non-interleaved mode with the
> -ni option.
> Pos:  69.6s   1536f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 470mb
> A-V:0.035 [1024:447]
> Pos:  69.6s   1537f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 470mb
> A-V:0.039 [1024:447]
> Pos:  69.6s   1538f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 470mb
> A-V:0.044 [1024:447]
> Pos:  69.7s   1539f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 471mb
> A-V:0.006 [1025:447]
> Pos:  69.7s   1540f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 471mb
> A-V:0.010 [1026:447]
> Pos:  69.8s   1541f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 471mb
> A-V:0.014 [1026:447]
> Pos:  69.8s   1542f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 471mb
> A-V:0.019 [1026:447]
> 1 duplicate frame(s)!
> Pos:  69.9s   1543f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  80min 472mb
> A-V:0.023 [1026:447]
> Too many video packets in the buffer: (4096 in 8277533
> bytes).
> Maybe you are playing a non-interleaved stream/file or the
> codec failed?
> For AVI files, try to force non-interleaved mode with the
> -ni option.
> Pos:  69.9s   1544f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 470mb
> A-V:0.027 [1026:448]
> Pos:  70.0s   1545f ( 2%)  12fps Trem:  79min 470mb
> A-V:0.031 [1026:448]
> 
> Note that the erors don't crop up until pos 69 and continue
> from there.  I'm using -ofps 23.976 -vf
> softpulldown,detc=dr=1 as per Richard's recommendation. 
> However, taking out softpulldown doesn't solve the problem.

Does the problem still happen if you remove all the filters?

Rich