[MPlayer-users] mplayer win32 issue
Paul-Kenji Cahier
pkc at F1-Photo.com
Fri Nov 14 17:53:25 CET 2003
as i said it's not very accurate
but i use the performance tool of control pannel=>administrative tools
> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
>> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read DOCS/bugreports.html]
>> if you look at the last two benchmarks, they were made wsith this
>> version
> I see. I wonder if it displays CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 0 3DNow2: 0
> SSE: 1 SSE2: 1
> for these.
<17:52:45> DeathWolf at lafiel:~/mplayer Benchmarks/mplayer-mingw32-dev-CVS-030913_with_dl_malloc$
./mplayer.exe \[dRips\]_Neon_Genesis_Evangelion_Revival_-_Opening_-_DVDRip.Sample.1000.Frames.avi
MPlayer dev-CVS-030913-18:28 (C) 2000-2003 MPlayer Team
CPU: Intel Pentium 4 Northwood (Family: 8, Stepping: 4)
Detected cache-line size is 64 bytes
CPUflags: MMX: 1 MMX2: 1 3DNow: 0 3DNow2: 0 SSE: 1 SSE2: 1
>> > [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read
> DOCS/bugreports.html]
>> >> [Automatic answer: RTFM (read DOCS, FAQ), also read
> DOCS/bugreports.html]
>> >> okay here are some results:
>> >> (without sound seems clearly faster, would sound be the prob?)
>> >> I did the tests with a quant2 xvid clip, with bframes, at high
>> >> bitrate, and ac3 audio(the results are very similar to all tests i
>> >> did)
>> >> when comparing approximatly the cpu usage:
>> >>
>> >> mplayer with default options ~44% average
>> >> media player classic ~35% average
>> >> graphedit ~22% average
>> >>
> How do you get the numbers of graphedit and media player classic?
> I want to do some tests myself.
> Sascha
> _______________________________________________
> RTFM!!! http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/DOCS
> Search: http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu/cgi-bin/htsearch
> http://mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-users
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list