[MPlayer-users] lavc vs. xvid (and improving lavc quality)

Matthias Wieser matthias-wieser at t-online.de
Sat Jun 5 23:29:43 CEST 2004

D Richard Felker III wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:38:38AM +0200, Matthias Wieser wrote:
> > Maybe they overlooked the link to "precompiled windows version of
> > libavcodec" at the libavcodec homepage?
> > Oh - there is no such link? That's the reason they took the best
> > windows-version of lavc they could downlaod.
> Quit being an ass. It's not our job to make windoze .exes for you.

I don't need any windows *.exe.

> But 
> if doom9 is going to include lavc in a comparison they had better
> *($#&(*$# do it right rather than publish lies.

They used the version most of their (Windows-) readers would probably use.
If they had done the review now, maybe they would have found 
http://ffmpeg.sourceforge.net/ffmpeg-doc.html#SEC24 and compiled a own 

(I'm still looking for a better comparison than doom9's)


More information about the MPlayer-users mailing list