[MPlayer-users] RFC: docs update for "how to create a high quality DVD rip"

ivanova flamingivanova at punkass.com
Wed Jun 9 15:45:53 CEST 2004


On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 05:07:07 -0700
rcooley <rcooley at spamcop.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:37:37 +0300
> Alexei Khlebnikov <a.khlebnikau at sam-solutions.net> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > In my opinion, tests must be real, because the life is too real. 
> 
> That's fine and all, but the original subject is how Hans du Plooy
> <hdp at webmail.co.za> thinks 96k Vorbis audio sounds lowsy next
> to 192k AC3.
> 
> Then it twisted-off into ivanova <flamingivanova at punkass.com> claiming
> that MP3 sounded as good as Vorbis, and used the test as "proof".
> 
> Perhaps real-world tests are better, perhaps they are not, it really
> doesn't matter one bit, because the issue here is NOT about how good a
> codec sounds on crappy equpiment.  Good test, bad test, whatever you
> believe, it is a very bad test in this context...

I never claimed "..that MP3 sounded as good as Vorbis." . Please quote me more accurate than that. I said that there is little difference between them. I probably should have added "under real world conditions" for which the mentioned tests are a valid comparison. That said, I don't think the tests Rjamorim and other do are on that crappy equipment. Certainly higher than Joe Averages equipment.




More information about the MPlayer-users mailing list