[MPlayer-users] MPplayer and installing a new gcc version

RC rcooley at spamcop.net
Tue Oct 26 07:52:12 CEST 2004


On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 00:56:01 -0400
D Richard Felker III <dalias at aerifal.cx> wrote:

> quite the opposite. ffmpeg is massively slower, as in unplayable dvds
> versus playable dvds. 

time mplayer -vfm ffmpeg -nocache -benchmark 60\ Minutes\
2004Oct24_19\:00.02.mpeg -vo null -nosound

BENCHMARKs: VC: 488.218s VO:   0.320s A:   0.000s Sys: 113.034s = 
601.571s BENCHMARK%: VC: 81.1571% VO:  0.0531% A:  0.0000% Sys: 18.7898%
= 100.0000%

Exiting... (End of file)

real    10m1.853s
user    8m32.410s
sys     0m18.860s

time mplayer -vfm libmpeg2 -nocache -benchmark 60\ Minutes\
2004Oct24_19\:00.02.mpeg -vo null -nosound

BENCHMARKs: VC: 552.462s VO: 
 0.548s A:   0.000s Sys: 108.868s = 661.879s BENCHMARK%: VC: 83.4688%
VO:  0.0828% A:  0.0000% Sys: 16.4484%= 100.0000%

Exiting... (End of file)

real    11m4.031s
user    9m34.770s
sys     0m20.450s

Call me crazy, but it looks like ffmpeg is faster.  At the very
least, ffmpeg sure isn't a lot slower than libmpeg2.  That's using
dev-CVS-041008-12:19-3.2.2




More information about the MPlayer-users mailing list