[NUT-devel] NUT documentation

[Luca Barbato]

Måns Rullgård wrote:

> 
> What you're saying is that because any system CAN be abused, rather
> try to start out with something sane, you incorporate an existing,
> already very abused, "system" lock, stock and barrel.  Makes no sense
> to me.
> 

Last time we discussed it we ended with a "who implements the codeclist
got it in the spec", nobody stepped up with a list nicer than what we
have now.

lu

-- 

Luca Barbato

Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero