[Ffmpeg-devel] [PATCH] rewrite vhook/drawtext.c
Diego Biurrun
diego
Thu Sep 7 01:25:23 CEST 2006
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 12:25:39PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On 9/6/06, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 11:22:04AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >> On 9/6/06, Diego Biurrun <diego at biurrun.de> wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:13:19AM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> >wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> --- vhook/Makefile (revision 6179)
> >> >> +++ vhook/Makefile (working copy)
> >> >> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> >> >>
> >> >> %$(SLIBSUF): %.o
> >> >> - $(CC) $(LDFLAGS) -g -o $@ $(VHOOKSHFLAGS) $<
> >> >> + $(CC) $(LDFLAGS_$@) $(VHOOKLIBS) $(LDFLAGS) -g -o $@
> >> >$(VHOOKSHFLAGS) $<
> >> >
> >> >Why do you add $(VHOOKLIBS) here?
> >>
> >> it was a remaining from tests with cygwin patch.
> >>
> >> before I sent another patch with just this fix, do you really require
> >> incremental patches? It will take me some time and as I said, it's
> >> better to review the new code instead of changes. But if really
> >> required I can do :-)
> >
> >I'm not quite sure what you mean by incremental here.
>
> like the linux kernel guys like, something like "[PATCH 0/N] replace
> macros with inline functions" "[PATCH 1/N] ..."
It's not the Linux kernel guys. Every reviewer loves small and
self-contained patches.
Diego
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list