[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Warn about PAFF & Spatial

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:54:06AM -0400, Mark Buechler wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos <cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:
> 
> > Hi!
> >
> > Michael Niedermayer <michaelni <at> gmx.at> writes:
> >
> > > > Should I remove the warning?
> > >
> > > I have no objections.
> >
> > Reverted r13542.
> >
> > Sorry for the mess, Carl Eugen
> >
> 
> Ok, myself and others are now confused as to whether PAFF + spatial direct
> is really fully supported. The samples provided show errors but are those
> errors now thought to be caused by some other issue? Could perhaps the
> samples be incorrect?

Debug the code
Cleanup the code
and dont forget sending patches.

If i knew where the problem is exactly i would fix it.
Besides i honestly dont care about PAFF & MBAFF at all.
Progressive H.264 should be finally working now after i fixed it ...
There are many PAFF & MBAFF reference samples that do not decode correctly

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The greatest way to live with honor in this world is to be what we pretend
to be. -- Socrates
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20080723/aa534c2f/attachment.pgp>