[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Warn about PAFF & Spatial

[Serguei Miridonov]

On Wednesday 23 July 2008, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:54:06AM -0400, Mark Buechler wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos 
<cehoyos at ag.or.at> wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Michael Niedermayer <michaelni <at> gmx.at> writes:
> > > > > Should I remove the warning?
> > > >
> > > > I have no objections.
> > >
> > > Reverted r13542.
> > >
> > > Sorry for the mess, Carl Eugen
> >
> > Ok, myself and others are now confused as to whether PAFF +
> > spatial direct is really fully supported. The samples provided
> > show errors but are those errors now thought to be caused by some
> > other issue? Could perhaps the samples be incorrect?
>
> Debug the code
> Cleanup the code
> and dont forget sending patches.
>
> If i knew where the problem is exactly i would fix it.
> Besides i honestly dont care about PAFF & MBAFF at all.

Michael, I do not ask you why just because this is a developing list. 
But could you please post a few links which you think best explain 
pro and contra of 24/p video? For me 60/i video looks much much 
smoother than 24/p. On TV or computer monitor -- does not matter. So, 
if 24/p is so good, what I do wrong with 24/p video captured by my 
camcorder?

Just links, please. Sorry for offtopic.

Serguei.