David Conrad <lessen42 at gmail.com> writes: > On Apr 4, 2009, at 3:55 AM, David Conrad wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Slightly under 1% overall faster wmv3 decoding > > Actually, this should be better (I don't know why I thought vadd had a > 5 cycle latency...) OK -- M?ns Rullg?rd mans at mansr.com