On Apr 4, 2009, at 4:08 PM, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > David Conrad <lessen42 at gmail.com> writes: > >> On Apr 4, 2009, at 3:55 AM, David Conrad wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Slightly under 1% overall faster wmv3 decoding >> >> Actually, this should be better (I don't know why I thought vadd >> had a >> 5 cycle latency...) > > OK Applied