[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] QCELP postfilter

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:06:26PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni at gmx.at> wrote:
> > they all sound like shit, maybe 2.wav is amogth the better but its shit as
> > well.
> > It would be easier to compare fewer files, 7 is too many.
> > You should think about what question you want to awnser and make a
> > test for that, not just dump 7 files onto testers
> [..]
> 
> OK, so if I throw just "FFmpeg decoder with reference postfilter" and
> "FFmpeg decoder with my postfilter" on you, does that help? I really
> should include "FFmpeg decoder without postfilter" at the very least,
> even if that one is not blind, as a "baseline".

the problem i have with this is that we dont know if the ffmpeg decoder
is correct. It feels like building on an unsound foundation.
i really would like to start with a qt decoder vs reference decoder vs
ffmpeg with reference postfilter.
also a more varied sample, that is female + male voice might be a good
idea.


[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If you really think that XML is the answer, then you definitly missunderstood
the question -- Attila Kinali
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20100407/83fcbe70/attachment.pgp>