[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH][0.5] libx264.c backport
Jason Garrett-Glaser
darkshikari
Mon Feb 15 18:39:07 CET 2010
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> wrote:
> On Mo, Feb 15, 2010 at 09:59:01 (CET), Jason Garrett-Glaser wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Find attached a propsed patch to backport libavcodec/libx264.c.
>>>
>>> Features:
>>>
>>> ?- supposed to work with x264 API versions from 65 to 84
>>> ?- tested with API version 67 (built statically), encoding works fine
>>> ?- tested with API version 84 (built dynamically in form of a debian
>>> ? package), encoding works fine
>>> ?- work is heavily based on work by Jason
>>> ?- the "patch" is actually based on the libx264.c version currently in
>>> ? trunk. It is nevertheless presented in form of a diff against
>>> ? branches/0.5. When reviewing, please make sure to diff against trunk
>>> ?- some (most?) presets have been updated
>>>
>>> Left questions:
>>>
>>> ?- do we want to have this backport in branches/0.5 at all? (I think so)
>>> ?- how does this updated libx264 wrapper work with the updated presets
>>> ? but compiled against API version 65/67?
>>
>> Some notes about this:
>>
>> 1) It should work just fine with older x264 APIs
>>
>> 2) I explicitly designed the patch to support all x264 APIs between 65
>> and today, with a minimum of ifdefs. ?Note I did _not_ design the
>> patch to require the minimum amount of _changes_ from 0.5. ?As I don't
>> care at all about 0.5, let alone its svn history, my goal was to make
>> the best code possible, not the best patch.
>
> [ sidenote, by proposing this patch, you already demonstrated that you
> ?do care about the 0.5 branch ]
No, I just want people to update their x264 ;)
Dark Shikari
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list