[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Increasing the max length of control URI to 2048 characters, as urls of some RTSP streams do exceed this limit.

Yiğit (Yeet) Uyan yigituyan at google.com
Fri Aug 7 02:20:33 EEST 2020


Not quite. RTSP/S links follow a similar pattern as common web URIs, i.e.
<rtsps://my.camera.server:port/...>, and in many cases these links are
generated, routed and modified by common underlying infrastructure. AFAIK,
the common conception for the web when parsing a URI is to expect up to
2000 characters.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/417142/what-is-the-maximum-length-of-a-url-in-different-browsers

The link above is for browsers, but it is very similar in many other web
technologies as well. Hence if there is going to be a hard limitation at
some number, putting it to 2048 characters would make sense (and unblock
the problems we are experiencing with rtsps streams).


*•  **Yiğit (Yeet) Uyan*
*•*  Smart Home Intelligence | Google Home
*•*  yigituyan at google.com



On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 2:15 AM mypopy at gmail.com <mypopy at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:47 AM Yiğit (Yeet) Uyan
> <yigituyan-at-google.com at ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Zhilizhao,
> >
> > The RTSPState you mentioned is ok, but we need to get the char
> control_uri
> > buffer from 1024 characters to 2048. Some of the long rtsps links are
> > getting cut, and cannot play. Can you help getting this patch to the next
> > version? The patch does not show up in https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/ at
> the
> > moment.
> >
> > *•  **Yiğit (Yeet) Uyan*
> > *•*  Smart Home Intelligence | Google Home
> > *•*  yigituyan at google.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:58 PM zhilizhao <quinkblack at foxmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Aug 6, 2020, at 10:46 AM, zhilizhao <quinkblack at foxmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> On Aug 6, 2020, at 6:38 AM, Yiğit (Yeet) Uyan <
> > > yigituyan-at-google.com at ffmpeg.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hello everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> This is the first time for me to send a patch via email. Is this the
> > > >> correct format?
> > > >>
> > > >> I would appreciate it if someone could confirm, and if there is
> anything
> > > >> else I need to do to get it into upcoming releases.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best,
> > > >>
> > > >> *•  **Yiğit (Yeet) Uyan*
> > > >> *•*  Smart Home Intelligence | Google Home
> > > >> *•*  yigituyan at google.com
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 11:30 AM <device.access.test at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> From: Yiğit (Yeet) Uyan <yigituyan at google.com>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Yiğit (Yeet) Uyan <yigituyan at google.com>
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>> libavformat/rtsp.h | 2 +-
> > > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> diff --git a/libavformat/rtsp.h b/libavformat/rtsp.h
> > > >>> index 54a9a30c16..2b37f5b49f 100644
> > > >>> --- a/libavformat/rtsp.h
> > > >>> +++ b/libavformat/rtsp.h
> > > >>> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ typedef struct RTSPState {
> > > >>>    /** some MS RTSP streams contain a URL in the SDP that we need
> to
> > > use
> > > >>>     * for all subsequent RTSP requests, rather than the input URI;
> in
> > > >>>     * other cases, this is a copy of AVFormatContext->filename. */
> > > >>> -    char control_uri[1024];
> > > >>> +    char control_uri[2048];
> I know 1024 is a hard limitation, but this patch have the same problem if
> the length of the Control URL Attribute in RTSP SDP > 2048
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-request at ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".


More information about the ffmpeg-devel mailing list