[FFmpeg-devel] Patchwork FATE Errors
Soft Works
softworkz at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 21 00:12:00 EET 2022
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-bounces at ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Andreas
> Rheinhardt
> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 10:22 PM
> To: ffmpeg-devel at ffmpeg.org
> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Patchwork FATE Errors
>
> Soft Works:
> >
> > andriy/make_fate_ppc
> >
> > => Does it possibly need 'make fate-rsync'?
> >
>
> No. The test does not rely on need samples;
It was just a very quick guess, because yesterday I rebased and
saw the test matroska-dovi-write-config7 failing which was fixed
after fate-rsync - that's why I though it might be the same reason
(with make -jX, it's probably not deterministic, which test will
fail first).
> and the other test that uses
> this sample works fine. Some time ago, someone else wrote FATE tests for
> AVDOVIDecoderConfigurationRecord in Matroska
> (https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20220101165153.440729-6-
> tcChlisop0 at gmail.com/).
> These were faulty and one of them relied on a sample that has apparently
> never been uploaded (but this test is actually redundant with the other
> test), so I investigated and saw that the test (presumably
> unintentially) reencoded audio, so I switched it to a pure copy test and
> applied it, believing that codec-copy tests could not possibly for some
> arches. That was a mistake and I am deeply sorry for this mess.
Nevermind - things happen..
BTW, I was thinking about submitting a patch for libavutil/tests/md5.c
something like:
#ifdef __GNUC__
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
#endif
#ifdef __clang__
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wdiscarded-qualifiers"
#endif
Would that make sense?
Those warnings are appearing in every single fate error output on patchwork,
possibly covering up more relevant things.
softworkz
More information about the ffmpeg-devel
mailing list