[MPlayer-dev-eng] recent vidix pcidb patch

[Diego Biurrun]

Vladimir Mosgalin writes:
> On Tue, 11 May 2004, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> 
> DB>>  From looking into ati driver, I learned that it knows 9 RV350 & 6 R350
> DB>> models, why only one R360? Actually, there are no R360s listed at all.
> DB>> Also, I know how it would call your card:
> DB>> ATI R350 NJ (R9800)
> DB>> disregarding the fact it is R360...
> DB>Which driver?
> 
> binary driver from ati. Version 3.7.6 has 9800XT support.
> 
> DB>> Imho change it to R350_NJ or R360_NJ, which one do you like better...
> DB>Let me ask once again: Why NJ and not XY or AB?  I thought these model
> DB>names were not just random characters...
> 
> I don't know! It's just that I always seen on forums that it writes R350 NJ
> for 9800 XT cards.

I have seen the 9800 XT card identified as R360, it has the R360
chipset after all.

> ATI R350SE AH (R9800SE)
> ATI R350 AK (Fire GL unknown)
> ATI R350 NH (R9800)
> ATI R350LE NI (R9800LE)
> ATI R350 NJ (R9800)
> ATI R350 NK (Fire GL X2)
> 
> NH is 9800 non-pro/pro. The only suitable model left is NJ.
> 
> Another possibility (since NJ model exists in 3.7.0 driver, which
> doesn't support XT cards) is that some hack was added to identify 9800
> XT as (some other) 9800 card. But who cares? If even official drivers
> has such errors, it wouldn't be a shame for mplayer to have the same.

There is not really much point, but whatever, I'll change the model
number to R360 and keep the NJ, it is slightly less wrong, whatever
that may mean..

Diego