[MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] fix for -srate bug
Michael Niedermayer
michaelni at gmx.at
Thu Oct 28 02:06:33 CEST 2004
Hi
On Thursday 28 October 2004 01:38, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
> >btw, iam very interrested in any feedback about its quality especially if
> > it includes a hint on how to improve it
>
> I have been flicking through your code a little. Do you have any
> references to the algorithm you are using?
blackman nuttall windowed sinc, its trivial to change it to ANY other linear
resampling algorithm, and ive never seen a non-linear one used for audio, and
u dont even seem to know what linear means ...
>
> From my limited understanding of the code, I can't really see how you
> are getting the claimed high quality results? For example on
> upsampling, are you actually bandlimiting? If not, then aren't you
> going to get horrendous aliasing?
well, listen to it, if u hear some aliasing, tell me ill fix it
>
> I've only just started looking at the code, so no doubt I have
> completely misunderstood what is happening. All the obvious paramters
> seem to be in place for example.
>
> Thanks for any insight
>
> Ed W
>
> P.S. Have just been flicking through "jos"
> (http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/), and there are a couple of
> references to "libsamplerate being the best quality freely resampler
> available right now". Clearly just opinions, but based on my listening
> tests so far, it does indeed set a high benchmark. Interested to see
> what we can do with the lavc resampler though
if u did any double blind listening tests please elaborate against what did u
test libsamplerate? what samples where used what the results where ...
[...]
--
Michael
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your
right to say it." -- Voltaire
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list