[MPlayer-dev-eng] Re: live.com vs gcc 2.95

Diego Biurrun diego at biurrun.de
Mon Jan 3 00:27:09 CET 2005

Diego Biurrun writes:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 07:46:32AM -0800, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> > 
> > You *must* compile the LIVE.COM libraries with the same version of the 
> > compiler that you use to built MPlayer.  If you do this (and follow the 
> > instructions in <http://www.live.com/mplayer/>), it will should build 
> > correctly.  (Don't forget to do a "make clean" everywhere beforehand, just 
> > in case...)
> I used the same compiler for both, gcc 2.95.4, which is the default for my
> system.  Some more details of what I did: I downloaded the latest LIVE.COM
> version (20041223), compiled and moved the whole dir to /usr/local/lib/,
> then I used a vanilla MPlayer tree, did a make distclean, configure, make.
> I have no problems with gcc 3.3, but that version is so much slower to
> compile :-/
> Can anybody confirm this behavior?

I just discovered that I somehow managed to goof up symlinks and g++
(which most of the stuff I compile uses) was pointing at 2.95 while
c++ (which live.com uses) was pointing at 3.3...  So scratch this
issue and sorry for bothering.

Now where did I put that Coke bottle.. ?


More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list