[MPlayer-dev-eng] Re: live.com vs gcc 2.95
Diego Biurrun
diego at biurrun.de
Mon Jan 3 00:27:09 CET 2005
Diego Biurrun writes:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 07:46:32AM -0800, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> >
> > You *must* compile the LIVE.COM libraries with the same version of the
> > compiler that you use to built MPlayer. If you do this (and follow the
> > instructions in <http://www.live.com/mplayer/>), it will should build
> > correctly. (Don't forget to do a "make clean" everywhere beforehand, just
> > in case...)
>
> I used the same compiler for both, gcc 2.95.4, which is the default for my
> system. Some more details of what I did: I downloaded the latest LIVE.COM
> version (20041223), compiled and moved the whole dir to /usr/local/lib/,
> then I used a vanilla MPlayer tree, did a make distclean, configure, make.
>
> I have no problems with gcc 3.3, but that version is so much slower to
> compile :-/
>
> Can anybody confirm this behavior?
I just discovered that I somehow managed to goof up symlinks and g++
(which most of the stuff I compile uses) was pointing at 2.95 while
c++ (which live.com uses) was pointing at 3.3... So scratch this
issue and sorry for bothering.
Now where did I put that Coke bottle.. ?
Diego
More information about the MPlayer-dev-eng
mailing list