[MPlayer-dev-eng] Re: live.com vs gcc 2.95

[D Richard Felker III]

On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:27:09AM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> Diego Biurrun writes:
> > On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 07:46:32AM -0800, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> > > 
> > > You *must* compile the LIVE.COM libraries with the same version of the 
> > > compiler that you use to built MPlayer.  If you do this (and follow the 
> > > instructions in <http://www.live.com/mplayer/>), it will should build 
> > > correctly.  (Don't forget to do a "make clean" everywhere beforehand, just 
> > > in case...)
> > 
> > I used the same compiler for both, gcc 2.95.4, which is the default for my
> > system.  Some more details of what I did: I downloaded the latest LIVE.COM
> > version (20041223), compiled and moved the whole dir to /usr/local/lib/,
> > then I used a vanilla MPlayer tree, did a make distclean, configure, make.
> > 
> > I have no problems with gcc 3.3, but that version is so much slower to
> > compile :-/
> > 
> > Can anybody confirm this behavior?
> 
> I just discovered that I somehow managed to goof up symlinks and g++
> (which most of the stuff I compile uses) was pointing at 2.95 while
> c++ (which live.com uses) was pointing at 3.3...  So scratch this
> issue and sorry for bothering.
> 
> Now where did I put that Coke bottle.. ?

I think you mean Pepsi... :)))))

Rich