[MPlayer-users] rant
Gabucino
gabucino at mplayer.dev.hu
Mon Oct 8 20:37:23 CEST 2001
It's the Question that drives us, Andr? Dahlqvist :
> I am not allowed to decide the license of mplayer, only the developers
> are. What I, and other people, have proposed is that mplayer's license
> allowes distribution of binaries. Just state in the docs that you do not
> support such binaries, and ignore such bugreports when they arrive. Is
> *that* so hard to understand and accept?
Is it so hard to understand that binaries/binary packages DECREASE
our reputation?
SHUT THE FUCK UP or find a player that uses a license that fits your ****
needs! Guess you really need that for playing!!
--
Gabucino
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-users/attachments/20011008/454c474f/attachment.pgp>
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list