[MPlayer-users] Packaged regressions
Carl Eugen Hoyos
cehoyos at ag.or.at
Wed Aug 8 22:13:43 CEST 2012
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson <at> cox.net> writes:
>
> On 08/08/2012 02:48 AM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
> [snip]
> > The packager of your MPlayer version intentionally compiled it with
> > several hundred known regressions (that are not reproducible with
> > MPlayer), some of them may be security relevant.
> > That is not necessarily connected to your problem (I don't know).
>
> How can we enumerate them so as to question the packager?
(I should have added that the Debian maintainers have repeatedly
stated they do not care about such bugs, no matter if they are
security relevant or not.)
As you probably know, FFmpeg is an integral part of the MPlayer
source code, your version was compiled against one of FFmpeg's
forks. This specific fork is known to contain several hundred
regressions, some of them possibly security relevant.
Fortunately, you don't have to trust my word about this:
Simply test fixed bugs from the FFmpeg bug tracker with avconv,
and open bugs from the fork's bug tracker with FFmpeg.
(You can also test open bugs from the FFmpeg bug tracker with
avconv and closed bugs from the fork's bug tracker with FFmpeg,
but you will not get many interesting results.)
Also consider testing old open bugs from roundup, some are also
only fixed in FFmpeg.
Of course, not every FFmpeg bug is reproducible with MPlayer,
but many are.
Allow me to add that some people have repeatedly stated that
there is (at least) one severe regression in FFmpeg over the
mentioned fork; unfortunately, so far nobody was able to
explain what this regression is about or how it can be
reproduced.
Carl Eugen
More information about the MPlayer-users
mailing list