[FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Release 6.1

[Michael Niedermayer]

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 05:27:23PM +0100, Derek Buitenhuis wrote:
> On 9/26/2023 4:30 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> > This is disingenuous sophistry, and honestly I find it insulting that
> > you expect people to swallow it.
> 
> I have been pretty silent on list, but as one of the people who has
> access to the Twitter account as a delegate (but who was locked out
> at the time of the tweet), it offensive to me on a personal level to
> insnuate that it is at all comparable to any tweet (few though they
> are) I have made, or that the situation is comparable.
> 
> It reads to me like purposely playing dumb. We aren't.

Iam not claimining anything is comparable.

Iam just asking that everyone is posting tweets for review. Same as thilo
long ago suggested

It is reasonable that the whole community can review public statements
that are made in the name of the project

This example here shows how easily this can go wrong (even if maybe you
never made a comparable tweet)

Thanks

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If the United States is serious about tackling the national security threats 
related to an insecure 5G network, it needs to rethink the extent to which it
values corporate profits and government espionage over security.-Bruce Schneier
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/attachments/20230926/3992d5de/attachment.sig>